Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- What’s a Webby Award, and Why Do People Care So Much?
- Gardenista’s 2013 Nomination: The Context That Makes It Even Cooler
- “Cast Your Vote”: How People’s Voice Voting Works (Then and Now)
- Why Voting Matters More Than You Think (Even If You’re “Just Clicking a Button”)
- What Makes a Gardening Website “Webby-Worthy”?
- Lessons From Gardenista’s Webby Moment (For Creators, Brands, and Readers)
- Conclusion: A Small Click, A Big Signal
- Reader Experiences: What It Feels Like to “Show Up” for a Beloved Site
Every once in a while, the internet does something wholesomelike handing out trophies for websites that make your life better instead of just stealing your
attention with a thousand-yard scroll. Enter: The Webby Awards, a.k.a. the “Internet’s highest honor,” a.k.a. that moment when your favorite
corner of the web gets to put on a tiny digital tuxedo and wave at the crowd.
In April 2013, Gardenistathe design-forward gardening site that treats outdoor spaces like rooms you can plantannounced a milestone that felt
equal parts champagne pop and muddy-knees victory: it had been nominated for a Webby Award in the Lifestyle category, right
as the site approached its first birthday. The headline said it best: “Cast Your Vote.” The vibe was even better: imagine getting an Oscar nomination at age 9,
but without repeating third grade.
If you’re reading this years later (hello, fellow time traveler), the original 2013 voting window is long closed. But the story still mattersbecause the
nomination wasn’t just a shiny badge. It was proof that a gardening site with real editorial taste, practical rigor, and a slightly mischievous sense of style
could compete on the same awards stage as the biggest names on the web. And it offers a surprisingly useful playbook for how online communities can rally around
the work they love.
What’s a Webby Award, and Why Do People Care So Much?
The Webby Awards have been recognizing excellence on the internet since 1996which, in internet years, is basically the Jurassic period (back
when “going online” sounded like you were boarding a spaceship). Presented by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences (IADAS),
the Webbys honor standout work across websites, video, advertising, podcasts, social, apps, and more. In plain English: they’re one of the most visible ways the
internet congratulates itself for being creative, useful, weird, and occasionally brilliant.
Two chances to win: the Academy and the People
The Webbys are built around a neat two-track idea:
an Academy-selected winner (industry experts weighing craft, execution, and impact) and
a public-voted winner (the internet doing what it does bestshowing up loudly for what it loves).
The public award is called the Webby People’s Voice Award.
This structure is why a nomination can feel like a starting gun. Being nominated means you’re already in the top tier of your category. But winning the
People’s Voice? That’s where community becomes the deciding factor.
The famous five-word speech
The Webbys also have a tradition that’s so internet it practically has a Wi-Fi signal: winners deliver five-word acceptance speeches. No
rambling. No “I’d like to thank the academy, my agent, and my childhood goldfish.” Just five wordssharp enough to fit in a tweet, memorable enough to stick
like a good tagline.
It’s a small detail, but it captures the Webby spirit: creativity under constraints, confidence without bloat, and a wink at the fact that online culture moves
fast. If your work wins, your speech becomes part of the internet’s highlight reel.
Gardenista’s 2013 Nomination: The Context That Makes It Even Cooler
Gardenista’s nomination wasn’t a “nice try” participation ribbon. It arrived at a specific, meaningful moment: the site was still young, and it was already
being recognized for doing something harder than it looksmaking gardening feel both aspirational and doable.
Gardenista launched as an independent site on May 22, 2012, with a point of view that treated outdoor living as a cultivated lifestyle, not a
checklist of chores. By April 2013, it had built enough momentum to land among the top nominees in the Webby Lifestyle category. That’s a fast
climb in an internet world where most new sites don’t even survive their first algorithm update.
Why “Lifestyle” is a deceptively competitive category
“Lifestyle” sounds breezylike it should come with a spa robe and cucumber water. In reality, it’s a category where the competition is fierce because the bar is
high: great lifestyle sites must be visually strong, editorially consistent, genuinely helpful, and emotionally resonant. They need to be both a magazine and a
tool belt. They have to inspire you and help you get something done.
Gardenista’s core advantage is that it doesn’t treat gardening like an isolated hobby. It treats it like design: materials, light, texture, proportion, and
practical choices that shape how you live. The result is content that speaks to people who want their yards, patios, and balconies to feel intentionaleven if
their “garden” is three pots and a chair that may or may not be held together by hope.
A nomination is also a signal of editorial clarity
Many websites try to be everything to everyone. Gardenista succeeds because it’s pickyin the good way. A Webby nomination tends to reward that kind of clarity:
a recognizable voice, a consistent standard for photography and presentation, and a focus that doesn’t wobble every time a new trend shows up wearing a novelty
hat.
In 2012, the site also earned outside recognition beyond the Webbysan important detail because it shows the nomination didn’t come out of nowhere. It had
already been noticed as a standout among new sites, validating that the webby nod was part of a broader pattern: a young site with real traction.
“Cast Your Vote”: How People’s Voice Voting Works (Then and Now)
In the original 2013 announcement, the call to action was straightforward: register, vote, and help Gardenista win the People’s Voice in its category. The
voting deadline in that year’s push was April 25, 2013, with a “last chance” reminder posted the day before.
While exact dates change every year, the basic mechanics of Webby People’s Voice voting have stayed recognizable. Here’s what the process generally looks like
today, based on the Webby voting guidance used in recent seasons:
Step-by-step: the typical People’s Voice flow
- Find the nominees on the official voting platform during the open voting window (often in early-to-mid April).
- Select your pick in each category you care about (you can search by category, name, or organization).
- Verify your voteusually via email confirmationso it counts.
- Repeat responsibly: vote in more categories if you like, but keep it honest and human.
The important part is that People’s Voice voting turns audience affection into measurable support. It’s not just “I like this site.” It’s “I like this site
enough to spend 60 seconds proving it.”
Why Voting Matters More Than You Think (Even If You’re “Just Clicking a Button”)
Let’s be real: internet voting can sound trivial. But awards like the Webbys are one of the few places where public attention is formalized.
The People’s Voice doesn’t replace expert judgmentit complements it. And for editorial brands, especially smaller ones, the impact can ripple outward in several
practical ways:
1) It helps quality compete with sheer size
Big brands have built-in reach. Independent or niche publications win by earning loyalty. A People’s Voice vote is one of the cleanest ways loyal readers can
help a smaller, sharper brand show up on the same scoreboard as giants.
2) It rewards usefulness, not just hype
The sites people actually vote for tend to be the ones they use: the place they return to when they need ideas, instructions, confidence, or comfort.
Gardenista’s nomination fit that patterna “save this for later” site before “save this for later” became a lifestyle.
3) It strengthens community identity
Voting is a tiny ritual that says, “This is my corner of the internet.” Gardening communities are especially good at this because they’re built on shared
patience, shared experiments, and shared wins. (Nothing bonds people faster than collectively realizing you’ve all been underwatering the same plant.)
What Makes a Gardening Website “Webby-Worthy”?
If you zoom out from the Gardenista story, you get an interesting question: what does “award-winning” look like for a lifestyle site about gardens?
The answer isn’t just pretty photosthough, yes, please, give us the pretty photos.
Design that serves the content
A great lifestyle site should feel like walking into a well-designed room: you know where to look, you want to linger, and nothing screams for attention.
Navigation matters. Typography matters. Mobile experience matters. (If a site is impossible to read on your phone while you’re standing in a nursery aisle, it’s
failing a core lifestyle use case.)
Editorial authority without the lecture
The best gardening guidance is confident but not condescending. It respects that readers have different climates, budgets, and attention spans. A Webby-level
site tends to show its expertise through specificity: clear recommendations, honest trade-offs, and advice that accounts for real life (like the fact that many
people garden in 20-minute bursts between everything else).
Utility plus delight
Internet excellence isn’t only about function; it’s also about feeling. Garden content, at its best, gives you both: the practical “here’s what to do” and the
emotional “here’s why it’s worth doing.” That blendusefulness with charmis exactly the kind of thing that gets noticed in awards ecosystems.
Lessons From Gardenista’s Webby Moment (For Creators, Brands, and Readers)
Even as a historical snapshot, Gardenista’s 2013 nomination is a case study in how internet brands grow the right way: consistency over chaos, voice over
volume, and community over gimmicks.
For creators: build a “return habit,” not just a viral spike
Webby recognition tends to follow brands that people return to. A viral post might bring traffic; a reliable editorial standard brings loyalty. If your work
helps someone solve a problemor feel more capableyou’ve created the kind of value that communities will actually rally around.
For readers: your attention is a vote (and sometimes a literal vote)
We like to pretend we’re passive consumers online. We’re not. What we click, bookmark, share, and support shapes which kinds of work survive. People’s Voice
voting is just that reality made explicit: a reminder that the internet is built by creators, but sustained by readers who show up.
For brands: awards are marketing, but they’re also accountability
The best part of a nomination isn’t the badge; it’s the pressure to keep earning it. When your audience votes for you, you’re making a quiet promise back:
“We’ll keep the quality high. We’ll keep showing up. We won’t phone it in.”
Conclusion: A Small Click, A Big Signal
Gardenista’s Webby nomination in 2013 captured something timeless about the web at its best: expert work made accessible, design made practical, and a community
invited to participate instead of just consume. Whether you followed the original “Cast Your Vote” push in real time or you’re discovering it now, the point
stands: when a site consistently helps people create a more beautiful lifeinside or outsiderecognition tends to follow.
And if you ever find yourself staring at a People’s Voice ballot in a future Webby season, wondering whether your vote matters, remember: the internet runs on
attention, but it’s powered by choice. Clicking “vote” is just choosing out loud.
Reader Experiences: What It Feels Like to “Show Up” for a Beloved Site
I can’t claim personal memories of voting in 2013 (I’m software, not a time-traveling gardener), but I can describe a pattern that shows up again and
again whenever a niche community gets a big public moment: people treat the vote like a tiny act of loyaltywith surprisingly real emotional payoff.
For many readers, a site like Gardenista isn’t “content.” It’s a companion. It’s the tab you open when you’re deciding whether your patio can handle one more
container (it can, if you believe hard enough). It’s the voice that reassures you that a messy garden is still a garden. So when that site gets nominated for a
Webby, the reaction isn’t just “nice.” It’s “Waitthey noticed us.”
One common experience people describe is the sudden urge to recruitpolitely, enthusiastically, and with just a hint of friendly menace. You text your sibling:
“Vote for this!” You message a friend: “It takes one minute.” You post it in a group chat where nobody asked for it, but everyone secretly appreciates the
nudge. It’s not unlike telling your neighbor you found a great nursery saleexcept the sale is civic pride, and the product is a digital trophy.
Another experience is how voting sharpens your awareness of what you value online. When you’re asked to choose a “best lifestyle site,” you start mentally
auditing your habits. Which site actually helps me? Which one makes me feel smarter instead of smaller? Which one respects my time? People’s Voice voting
turns vague appreciation into a decision, and that decision can be clarifying. It reminds you that taste isn’t just aestheticit’s ethical. You’re endorsing a
standard.
There’s also a very human pleasure in participating in something bigger than your own screen. The internet can be isolating; voting flips the feeling. You’re
part of a wave. You imagine other readers clicking the same button from other cities, other climates, other livessome on balconies, some on farms, some in
apartments where the only “outdoor space” is a window ledge. That shared action, however small, feels like community made visible.
Finally, there’s the joyful, slightly ridiculous tradition of imagining the five-word acceptance speech. People love brainstorming them because it’s a creative
constraint that makes the moment feel playful. It’s the perfect garden metaphor, honestly: limited space, big personality. You can almost picture it on a
hand-lettered plant marker. “Thanks! Now please water us.” “We grow best with readers.” “Dirt under nails, always.” Five words, infinite grin.
In the end, that’s the real experience of a Webby nomination for a beloved site: it’s a reminder that the internet still has pockets of genuine enthusiasm
communities that don’t just scroll, but care. And if you’ve ever cared enough to vote, you already know the secret: the click isn’t the point. The showing up
is.
